At 2:42 p.m. on May 6, 2010, something unbelievable happened. Nearly $1 trillion vanished from the stock market in just 5 minutes. No bombs. No hackers. Just… code. What really happened that day? A Sudden Freefall A trader’s hand urgently reaching for the “CIRCUIT EMERGENCY” button — symbolizing the moment of panic. On what seemed like a normal trading day, the Dow Jones suddenly plunged 998.5 points. This massive drop wiped out close to $1 trillion in market value—only to recover within minutes. This wasn’t a glitch. It was a systemic chain reaction . The Algorithm That Didn’t Wait A wall clock showing 2:42 p.m. , overlaid with crashing red stock charts — the exact moment the crash began. The root cause? A Kansas-based mutual fund placed a massive sell order: 75,000 E-mini S&P 500 futures contracts . The algorithm was simple: Sell as quickly as possible , no matter the price, no matter the volume. High-Frequency Trading (HFT) bots noticed. They didn’t p...
🟢 Introduction
In 2008, a couple in New Zealand tried to name their baby "4Real."
Yes, that’s a number followed by a word — their intent was to express that their child was “truly real.”
But what they didn’t expect was a flat-out rejection from the government, followed by a fine.
It may sound absurd, but this isn’t fiction — it’s a true story that sparked global debate about parental rights and government control.
🟢 Main Story
New Zealand has an official list of banned baby names.
The law prohibits names that are:
-
offensive,
-
misleading,
-
trademarked,
-
or likely to cause the child social harm.
So names like:
-
Lucifer (too provocative)
-
Justice (sounds like a legal title)
-
V8 (car brand)
-
Anal (self-explanatory)
-
Harry Potter (copyright issue)
...have all been legally rejected.
In the case of “4Real,” officials argued the name resembled a corporate slogan, not a human identity.
And once the decision was made, the couple had no appeal process. The rejection was final.
“We must prevent children from being ridiculed due to their name.”
— New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs
While the intention is protection, many have questioned whether this goes too far.
Where does protection end and control begin?
Parents in New Zealand aren’t the only ones facing this —
similar name restrictions exist in countries like Germany, Sweden, Iceland, and Malaysia.
🟢 Conclusion
This isn’t just a quirky news item — it’s a reflection of a growing trend.
Even names — one of the most personal human decisions — can be policed.
As bizarre as it sounds… it’s true.
And it reminds us how deep state control can reach, even into our own homes.
Bizarre but true. This was DISNAM.
.png)
👉 Korean Version Blog: https://blog.naver.com/disnamedu
👉 Watch related YouTube video: http://www.youtube.com/@DisnamEdu
Comments
Post a Comment